Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Intelligence: A Product of Social Construction Essay example -- essays

Intelligence A Product of Social ConstructionSince the development of the intelligence quotient, schools in every part of the instauration have been using the IQ test to categorize millions of students into three groups. These three groups, which atomic number 18 the gifted, the average, and the retarded, are falsifications that perpetuate in our world culture and cause more than gifted students to be deemed retarded and vice a versa. Why then is the IQ test so heavily relied on in our school systems? For schools the dish up is simple, an I.Q. test is a reliable predictor of a students later performance in faculty members. This answer is relatively true, but where the I.Q. test falls super victimize is with testing the multiple intelligences of the human brain. The intelligence quotient test, developed by Alfred Binet, was created to evaluate ones intelligence with a test that would yield a numerical value that could be compared with a collective average to determine ones le vel of intelligence. However, the questions of an I.Q. test, or even the SATs for that matter, are testing only the verbal-mathematical forms of intelligence. The human brain is extremely complicated and advanced, and to assume that the indicators of intelligence are only found in logical and linguistic intelligences is a poor assumption at best. A more comprehensive test, which can test all cardinal types of intelligence, should be implemented into the educational system to ensure every student an education tailored to their strongest abilities. In every elementary school in America third graders are forced to take a test that will greatly impact their academic careers. The G.A.T.E. program, which stands for gifted and talented education, is designed to separate the gifted children from the average and below average kids. However, the G.A.T.E. test is comprised of questions the children do not have the answers for. In other words, the kids are being tested on their innate knowledg e of the world and their ability to creatively solve problems they have never encountered. Some might believe thither is no flaw in testing a childs natural intelligence. The test is presumptuousness to each student and each student is given the same amount of time to complete a test of identical questions. But what educators fail to account for is the social bias of the test and the socio-eco... ...or each of the seven intelligences and students will be placed in the category of classes that he or she is best suited for. With this educational system career training can flummox a much younger age, students will develop in one direction rather than being spread thin over many profitless topics, and the professionals of the future will be identified before they ever enter the work force. In the current world, I.Q. tests are the gates that limit ones ability to get ahead a fair and equal education. The tests given now will delay to reward those lucky enough to live in the upper-m iddle class and will continue to hold a lid on the potential of the millions of people suppressed into the ghettos of America. New testing and rewriting of tests should be the first step in do American public education fair to all Americans. Eventually the socially constructed idea of intelligence will change, but not fade, and it is up to the people of this extension to redefine what makes a person intelligent.Works CitedJacobus A., Lee & Howard Gardner. A World of Ideas. A Rounded Version The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Bedford/St. Martins. 6th Ed. Boston, Ma. 2002. 373 391

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.